The Bible was not written down originally with chapters and verses in it. In the 1200s, a bishop named Stephen Langton divided the New Testament into the chapters we use today. Three hundred years later, and fifteen hundred years after the New Testament was actually written, a printer in Paris began printing Bibles with the verse divisions that we use today. The point is, the verse and chapters are just handy tools so that we can all agree on what part of the Bible we are looking at. These divisions were not inspired by God. In many cases, the divisions make sense when we consider what the text is actually saying. But sometimes they don't – as is the case in this portion of Acts. It seems to me that next section to study is Acts 4:32 through 5:11.
Briefly, what we have here is this: Even after the threats of the religious leaders, the believers are continuing to preach about Jesus boldly. They are continuing to do everything we learned about in Acts 2:42-47. Not only are they bold in preaching, they are bold in continuing to live as the Holy Spirit has led them to. Specifically, the believers are still using their goods and possessions for the kingdom of God. They are selling things when there is a need, and giving the money to be used by the disciples wherever it is needed. One outstanding example of this is a man named Joseph, whom the disciples called Barnabas. “Barnabas” means roughly, “one who encourages.”
We are given another example, however. And that is of a couple named Ananias and Sapphira. They also sold a field. But they only brought part of the proceeds, and kept some of it back for themselves. When Ananias brings the money to Peter, the Holy Spirit shows Peter what he has done. He has some harsh words for him, and Ananias falls dead. Later, his wife comes in and Peter gives her a chance to come clean. She doesn't, and Peter pronounces that she will die too, and she does, immediately.
This piece of scripture is one of the most troubling in the entire Bible. It looks to me like the Holy Spirit killed two people because they didn't bring enough money to the church. There are a few places like this in the Old Testament, but we can deal with those more easily. Those events are examples of God showing his Holiness, and showing us how much we need Jesus to make things right between us and Him. But in Acts, Jesus has already come. He has taken care of the Holiness problem that kept people so separate from God, and merited such severe and swift punishments. So why in the world did this happen now?
As I read this passage, I keep looking for the missing piece, the element of the story that will suddenly make everything clear and understandable. Luke, when he wrote, obviously felt that his readers (who were living 20-30 years after these events) would understand without further explanation. So we need to do a bit of “reading in between the lines” and look at things that might only be hinted at, or implied in this passage.
First, it seems clear from what Peter says in verses 3-4, that no one was forced to sell their possessions, or to bring the money to the church. This was a voluntary thing, and people did it as they were led by the Holy Spirit to do so. If they chose not to do it, that was fine too. The issue with Ananias and Sapphira was what they said to the apostles about it. In verse 8, Peter asks Sapphira, “tell me, did you sell the field for this price?” So the issue does not seem to be so much that they didn't give all their money to the church. Instead, the problem is that they said they gave all the money, while actually they did not. In other words, they lied.
Now, some of us may say, “Aw shucks! They were struck down by God for just telling a little lie about how much of their money they gave?” It's true, that doesn't seem to be much easier to swallow. But I think there is even more to the story. What, exactly was the nature of the lie?
There are two implications here. First, in verse 32 its says
“Now the multitude of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one said that any of his possessions was his own, but instead they held everything in common.”
But this was not really true in the case of Ananias and Sapphira. They did believe that their possessions were their own. They did not hold everything in common. And yet, they pretended that the opposite was true. They were following an external form, so that they looked like everyone around them, but they weren't really that way in their hearts. Since Peter makes it clear that they did not have to sell their field or donate the money, why did they do it? Most likely, so that others in the church would look up to them, the way people looked up to Barnabas. They did it for their own glory. They did it to appear holy and righteous when they were not. They were lying to others, to themselves, and to the Holy Spirit about the true condition of their hearts.
Second, it appears that the believers did not immediately sell all their possessions, but rather, from time to time, as the Holy Spirit prompted them, they would do this. The disciples had the attitude that everything they had was the Lord's, and to be used for his purposes. And when it seemed there was a need, or that the Lord was telling them to, they would sell stuff and donate the money. So when Ananias comes to the apostles with the money, he is apparently making a claim that the Holy Spirit prompted him to do this. So in this way, he is lying about the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit certainly didn't tell him to deceive the apostles about the amount. It is possible that the Holy Spirit did not even prompt to sell the field. In fact, if Ananias thinks it is OK to pretend to be something he is not, does he really even have the Holy Spirit in the first place? He may even be lying about being a Christian.
Peter identifies this as a lie against the Holy Spirit (Act 5:3). He probably remembers that Jesus said some serious words about this:
Anyone who isn't with me opposes me, and anyone who isn't working with me is
actually working against me. Every sin and blasphemy can be
forgiven—except blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, which will never
be forgiven. Anyone who speaks against the Son of Man can be
forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will never be
forgiven, either in this world or in the world to come. (Matt
12:30-32)
There is one other place in Acts where someone tries to pervert the ministry of the Holy Spirit. In Samaria, a man named Simon offers Peter and John money to give him the ability to manipulate the Holy Spirit. Peter says:
May your sliver be destroyed with you, because you thought the gift of God could be obtained with money! You have no part or share in this matter, because your heart is not right before God. (Acts 8:20-21)
So the idea of maligning the Holy Spirit in any way is a very big deal. It isn't clear to me whether God killed Ananias directly and personally, or whether he might have had a heart attack induced by the shock of being found out, and the fear from realizing he has just committed the one sin that can't be forgiven. Likewise, although Peter pronounces that Sapphira will be carried out by the same people who removed her husband's body, that doesn't necessarily mean that somehow the Holy Spirit caused her death.
However, whatever the cause of the death, this piece of scripture is here to tell us something. I think at the core level, God used this to show everyone in a physical way, what happens to those who pretend to have a relationship with Jesus, but actually do not. Pretending, for Ananias and Sapphira, resulted in death. Most people who pretend to be Christians in this day and age (but are not really) do not end up dying so dramatically. But they are just as dead inside as Ananias and Sapphira are physically.
While Jesus was here in the flesh, he had many conflicts with the Pharisees and religious leaders of his time. The heart of his issue with them, was that they were outwardly righteous, but inwardly, in their spirits, they had nothing to do with God. Ananias and Sapphira were the first Christians who attempted to be like the Pharisees. Outwardly, they were righteous, but in their spirits they were dead. The Holy Spirit showed the church the true spiritual condition of such people, by allowing their physical condition to match what was going on inside.
The message seems to be this: “Don't let this happen to my church! Don't come together and pretend to know me when you don't! Walk by my Spirit, not by outward appearances.” Maybe a plain a simple way to put it is this: spiritual hypocrisy=death. For Ananias and Sapphira, that death was physical. For everyone who pretends to belong to Jesus but doesn't really know him, that death is spiritual.
If you don't really know Jesus, you are still welcome to participate in the life of our church. We only ask, for your own sake, that you don't pretend that you know him, if you really don't. And there is good news. I don't know why Ananias didn't have a chance to repent. Sapphira was given a chance, and she chose not to. But in the other instance we looked at, from Acts 8:14-24, the man named Simon did repent, and we have every reason to believe that he was forgiven, and entered into a true relationship with Jesus. The same can be true of anyone else who has been pretending, without the reality of knowing.